Sudden Death of 42-Year-Old Woman After Corona Vaccination” Reveals “Zusan Inquiry into Cause of Death”

I want to know why my wife died.

On December 5, one month after the death of a woman in Aisai City, Aichi Prefecture, following inoculation with a new type of corona vaccine. The woman’s husband again demanded an investigation into the cause of his wife’s death.

The man’s wife, Ayano Iioka, died on November 5 at a mass vaccination site in Aisai City after her condition suddenly changed immediately after receiving the novel corona vaccine, and the government’s response to investigate the cause of death was exceptionally fast. With the arrival of the 8th wave of vaccination and the need to accelerate vaccination, it is likely that the government decided that this death should not be used as a brake.

First, on November 11, the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare (MHLW) released a report from the field as “a case reported as suspected anaphylaxis. The announcement was made less than a week after the case occurred, which can be said to be exceptionally fast. However, in the same report, after the first report of “suspected anaphylaxis,” there was a second report that denied the first report, stating that the case was reported as “suspected anaphylaxis, but reported as other reactions,” indicating the confusion at the site.

On November 17, the Aichi Medical Association held a press conference and announced its opinion that “if anaphylaxis is suspected, the patient should have received a muscular injection of adrenaline (deployed at the site) without hesitation in diagnosis, ” since the case was after vaccination and the possibility of the most severe anaphylactic shock was strongly suspected. The doctor made public his opinion that “if anaphylaxis was suspected, he should have given an intramuscular injection of adrenaline (which was deployed at the venue) without hesitation in diagnosis. However, he explained that even if adrenaline had been administered at the time the doctor was called, it would likely not have saved the patient’s life if he had been suffering from the most severe form of anaphylactic shock, and it cannot be ruled out that the cause of death was acute left heart failure.

The analysis was conducted by the Medical Safety Committee, consisting of members recommended by each medical association, as well as experts in emergency medical care and vaccination, lawyers, and others. We also obtained information from nurses who were working at the time and doctors at the hospital to which the patient was transported for emergency care.

However, no postmortem pathological autopsy was conducted, and the final pathological condition has not yet been clarified. After confirming her death at the hospital to which she was transported, “the doctor asked the bereaved family whether a pathological autopsy had been performed, but there was no response, and because the family was stunned, no further confirmation was made,” according to a statement in the deceased woman’s medical record.

However, Iioka’s husband, Eiji, told FRIDAY Digital, “I have not heard about the pathological autopsy.

I never heard about the pathological autopsy. After my wife passed away, my parents were with me and we saw the AI (autopsy imaging = imaging at the time of death) after she passed away. Her parents and family also came to the hospital 30 minutes later. If I was truly in no condition to confirm her wishes, there would have been a way to check with other family members besides me, but none of them were asked about the pathological autopsy. According to the published information, ‘I asked the family whether or not a pathological autopsy would be performed, but the family was so stunned that no further confirmation was made,’ which is written in the hospital’s medical records, but at least not in the records I saw.