Can I put it in?”?　”Sentence sought” for former Japanese table tennis player who claimed obscenity was a “misunderstanding”.

Sentencing hearing on January 21

I am the cause of this misunderstanding, and I am very sorry, and at the same time, I want to ask for forgiveness for myself.”

Kaihei Yoshida (Konishi at the time of his arrest), 44, a former representative of Japan’s national table tennis team who allegedly committed indecent acts against students and their mothers at the table tennis school where he coached, apologized in court to the victims.

Yoshida, who is accused of indecent assault and indecent assault on three women, will be sentenced on January 21, with the prosecution seeking five years in prison and the defense pleading not guilty.

Before introducing the arguments made by the prosecution and the defense in their plea, we would like to look back at the history of the case so far. Incidentally, all of Yoshida’s communication at the trial was conducted through a Chinese interpreter, and all of his statements were made by the interpreter. In addition, since the fourth trial held on October 3, the defendant’s name has been Yoshida Kaiwei instead of Konishi.

Yoshida was first arrested in August ’24.

On August 20, 2012, the Warabi Police Station of the Saitama Prefectural Police Department arrested Yoshida on suspicion of indecency with non-consent. On August 7, he was suspected of committing an indecent act against a student’s mother, Ms. A, who is in her 40s, at the “WEILAI Table Tennis School,” where he coaches.

About a month later, on September 30, he was arrested again on suspicion of indecent assault against Ms. B (in her 30s), who was also the mother of a student, for indecent acts in early June 2007.

WEILAI Table Tennis School” is a table tennis school run by his wife Anne Konishi, also a former representative of Japan’s table tennis team. The prosecutors indicted Yoshida on charges of indecent assault and quasi-forcible indecency against Ms. A, Mr. B, and Ms. C, a junior high school student who was victimized in July 2011.

Details of the crime and the defendant’s “side of the story”

The crime allegedly took place during the process of Yoshida giving massages and teaching stretching techniques. The prosecution alleges that Yoshida committed the alleged acts while teaching the parents how to give massages to their children, saying, “I want you to give massages to my children at home.”

For example, Ms. A complained that “without warning, the massage began, and she was asked to pose on all fours, saying, ‘Can you do this kind of posture?’ After that, he applied the lower part of her body to her relentlessly.

On the other hand, Yoshida said, “Mr. A’s posture was strange, so I touched his body to teach him the correct posture. I was just trying to teach her how to stretch, and I did not intend to be indecent .

Ms. B also claimed that “I was on all fours in the luggage storage area when I was touched on the lower half of my body.” She also stated that she protested that she thought it was strange when she was asked if she could enter the room, as if she was having sexual intercourse with him.

In response, defendant Yoshida claimed that he was just giving her a massage and teaching her how to stretch, and that it is possible that his lower body was hit in the process. He then decided to mount Ms. B in order to correct her posture, and asked her if he could ride her. He stated that when he approached Mr. B to mount him, Mr. B turned around and said, “That’s funny.

He recalled, “At the time, I thought about what was ‘funny,’ but I don’t remember what I said to Mr. B.”

Ms. C stated , “During the massage, he directly touched my buttocks and licked my ears. Then he said, ‘Close your eyes,’ and I shook my head from side to side, thinking that he was going to kiss me,” she complained.

Mr. Yoshida denied this , saying, “It is possible that during the massage, my hand accidentally hit (Ms. C’s) underwear, but I did not touch her directly. He also claims that he “thought [Ms. C] had fallen asleep during the massage because she was quiet, so I brought my face close to hers,” but did not lick her ear.

At the time, Ms. C filed a damage report for this incident, and defendant Yoshida was sent for prosecution. During the interrogation at that time, he lied, saying that he had not massaged Ms. C. He explained the reason for his lie, saying, “If I had told her that I had massaged her, she would have told me to close my eyes.

He said, “I was afraid that if I said I gave her a massage, she would think I really committed an indecent act.

After the incident with Ms. C, Yoshida said his wife forbade him from teaching girls.

I believe he is innocent.”

Regarding touching the victim’s body without her permission, even though it was to teach her how to massage and stretch, Yoshida reflected, “I had been in Europe (living) for a long time, so it was appropriate,” and expressed her remorse, saying , “In the future, I will make sure to touch the victim only after getting her consent.

At the argument held on December 9, the prosecution sought a sentence of “five years in prison” onthe grounds that “the defendant committed the indecent act by taking advantage of the victim’s psychological state where she trusted him as a table tennis instructor and could not easily resist, which was a bold, despicable, and cunning act.

On the other hand, defense counsel stated, “The three women mistakenly believed that Kaiwei had committed an indecent act based on their preconceived notion that he had sexual intentions,” and “The case is different from other sexual crimes in that we have to determine whether the three women were intentionally hit based on their senses in a case the defendant denies. In his final statement, he pleaded not guilty, saying, “The prosecutor has not proven the facts stated in the indictment.

In his final statement, he said , “I believe that I am not guilty. I ask the judge to look into the case even more carefully and to bring about a positive result,” said Yoshida.

Did Yoshida have sexual intentions or not? What decision will the judiciary make after hearing the words of the three victims in the trial so far?