The contents of America’s dangerous “Meghan’s Criticism” YouTube
According to an estimate by a U.S. magazine, the number of related video views on YouTube is about 500 million. If it is monetized, it would be worth 3.5 million dollars.
Who is the most “profitable person to criticize” in the world today? It is not Hollywood celebrities or heads of state who are being targeted by the international media and YouTube. It is Meghan, the wife of Britain’s Prince Henry (37).
Prince Henry and Meghan announced their engagement in November 2005. However, when Prince Henry announced in January 2008 that he was leaving the British Royal Family and would be living in North America, the couple came under intense scrutiny, and Meghan’s every move became a target of criticism.
Meghan’s use of the name “Duchess of Sussex” in public and her criticism of the royal family, even though she does not perform official duties, are unacceptable to British conservatives. On the other hand, public interest is high, and last year’s interview with Oprah Winfrey attracted 10 million viewers in the U.K. and 600,000 worldwide. Last year’s interview with Oprah Winfrey attracted 10 million viewers in the UK and 600,000 worldwide.
Negative rumors about Meghan are spreading on the Internet, ranging from her comments and fashion to her origins. On YouTube, channels dedicated to “slamming Meghan” are popping up like bamboo shoots after the rain, with “Yankee Wally” being a prime example. One of the best examples is “Yankee Wally,” which claims to be a “personal opinion,” but has a large number of videos criticizing Meghan for wearing heels even though she is eight months pregnant.
Newsweek magazine reported that Yankee Wally has sold 44,000 dollars (about 500,000 yen). Newsweek magazine reported that Yankee Wally has sold $44,000 (about 500,000 yen). Newsweek also reported that there have been 500 million views of Meghan-related videos, and that the “Meghan criticism market” is worth about $3.5 million.
There is a certain amount of tolerance in the UK when it comes to topics that would be litigious if reported by the major media, such as YouTube and social networking sites. This, combined with the British penchant for gossip and tabloids, attracts viewers who don’t care about the authenticity of the information as long as they can relate to it.
The media is no exception to the boom in criticism of Meghan. In March 2009, Piers Morgan, the famous host of the British commercial TV network ITV, was forced to quit his show because of his comments about Princess Meghan. However, he has signed contracts with two new media companies and has continued to criticize Meghan in the tabloids this year, calling her a “money-grubbing Hollywood celebrity.
For example, Thomas Markle, known as Meghan’s “disturbed biological father,” also gave an interview to a British TV program and criticized the couple. Thomas Markle, known as Meghan’s “boisterous biological father,” also gave an interview to a British TV program and criticized the couple, even suggesting that he received a large amount of money for his appearance.
The former princess has few allies, even her family has been bitten by the “Meghan money”.
From the February 11, 2022 issue of FRIDAY.
Photo: afro