The boom that even elementary school students used to talk about… The “tongue war” with Hiroyuki has brought an end to the “debunking boom,” and it looks as if Ryuichi Yoneyama has the upper hand.

ReHacQ, a YouTube channel featuring Hiroyuki Nishimura, a.k.a. “Hiroyuki” and Yusuke Narita, updated a video on November 25. Former Niigata Prefecture Governor and DPJ House of Representatives Representative Ryuichi Yoneyama was invited as a guest, and the second part of the video was released.

It was thought that he and Hiroyuki would “engage in a heated verbal battle ……,” but it appears that Yoneyama has the upper hand this time.

First, Yoneyama, who is also a doctor, argued that, in terms of social security reform, since Japan does not have universal health insurance and there are many insurance societies in each municipality, the national government should unify all the societies so that people can receive the same services. When I further explained that the number of doctors should be allocated in proportion to the population, Hiroyuki

He knows that people will say, “Are you going to leave the overpopulated old people to die? I think such psychopathic politicians are necessary in the overall design, so in that sense, they are interesting politicians.

He commented. However, Yoneyama said, “Psychopaths are very interesting in that sense.

I don’t think psychopaths are very good politicians,” Yoneyama said.

He added, “In the countryside, there are not enough doctors per capita.

He said, “Rural areas have few doctors per capita, so I am talking about ‘increasing’ the number of doctors by dividing the number of doctors by the population.

Yoneyama then continued, “I don’t think that Saikopass is a very good idea.

Yoneyama continued to explain the structure of the “national” health insurance system, but Hiroyuki used corporate social insurance benefits as an example. He then said

The national health insurance system that Mr. Yoneyama is talking about has been realized,” he said.

Yoneyama is right,

Yoneyama asked, “Do you know how many health insurance associations there are in each municipality?”

Yoneyama asked.

Yoneyama replied, “The services and premiums are the same throughout the country.

Yoneyama replied, “The services and premiums are the same throughout the country.

Each municipality is totally different,” Yoneyama said.

Yoneyama shrugged. Ryosuke Nishida, an associate professor at the Tokyo Institute of Technology, was also in the studio.

“Are National Health Insurance and National Pension mixed up?　I don’t think that part has been sorted out,” he pointed out.

He pointed out that “Yoneyama’s proposal for health care reform is not a good idea.

Mr. Yoneyama proposed a health care reform plan, but Mr. Hiroyuki did not understand the basic premise in depth, and in the end he seemed to be silent about what Mr. Yoneyama had to say. Afterwards, he brought up the subject of corporate welfare benefits and was rebutted by Yoneyama, who said, “That is a two-story building and has nothing to do with social security.

Hiroyuki also referred to Yoneyama’s prostitution of female university students, which had led to his retirement from the governor’s office in the past. Yoneyama maintained his stance of “no excuses.

Hiroyuki then challenged Yoneyama, saying that since Takehide Yoshikawa, a former LDP member of the House of Representatives, had resigned from the legislature after allegedly engaging in “daddy-daughter” activities with an 18-year-old, Yoneyama should quit as well.

But Yoneyama pointed out that “Mr. Kikkawa did not resign.

Yoneyama pointed out, “Mr. Kikkawa did not resign. Hiroyuki seemed to have assumed that Kikkawa had left the party and resigned from the House.

Yoneyama’s final thought was.

Mr. Hiroyuki is pretty ignorant of the premise. His knowledge is too limited.”

I came here to discuss policy, but I think it’s time to stop mixing things up and using the ‘Hiroyuki method,’ which is just to abuse and ridicule people,” Yoneyama commented.

He commented, “I’ve been discussing policy with you. In the comment sections of social networking sites and YouTube, the following comments were made on the debate

“He’s completely defeated, Kusa!
Yoneyama is the new king of argumentation.

Yoneyama is the new king of debunking.

“Do you have such data?” “Do you have any evidence? “Do you have any evidence? Hiroyuki’s definitive lines “Do you have such data?” and “Do you have any evidence? However, it is also a fact that his style of defeating his opponents has caused various frictions. In that sense, this debate may be the beginning of the end of the ‘debating boom. ……

It seems that the way of debate has begun to change with the times.