Extracting 500,000 Yen from Parents of Internet Defamers: The Pros and Cons of Hezumaryu’s Disclosure Request Business.

Is he trying to fix the world? ……

Former annoying YouTuber Hezuma Ryu has become a topic of conversation after visiting slanderers as a “home visit.

On March 25 at X (formerly Twitter)

“I have requested disclosure of the eight people who have maliciously slandered me.

and reported

《They will go directly to the person in question with their lawyer as a future course of action. If their attitude is bad or their apology is not conveyed, I will expose their names and companies.

The company also announced that it would expose the name and the company. He immediately revealed that he had gone to Kagoshima to meet the person who had slandered him on the 26th of the same month.

He was so scared that he broke down in tears, but I could not feel sorry for him at all. As soon as the settlement talks go well, I will come to Kanagawa next.

I will be coming to Kanagawa next as soon as the settlement is settled,” he wrote.

On the 8th, he updated his X and wrote

On the 8th, she updated her X and said, “I went with my lawyer to visit the home of a 48-year-old unemployed man in Kanagawa Prefecture who had filed a disclosure request.

On the 8th, he updated X with the following statement

We settled the case for 500,000 yen, so I will not reveal his name or address.

I settled the case for 500,000 yen, so I won’t expose his name or address. He continued

He had no savings, so he exploited his parents. He told me many times, “You are fat and ugly, and both your parents and your wife are disgusting. I think I deserved exactly what I got.

He declined. The post has been viewed 2.14 million times on X (as of the 10th) and continues to spread.

Slander on the Internet is never tolerated. In recent years, there have been cases where people have suffered from such slander and taken their own lives.

In the case of extremely egregious postings, it is possible to request the platform to disclose the sender’s information. This allows the defamers to be “identified” to a certain extent, but some people are not so sure about Mr. Hezuma’s method,” said a legal expert.

Hezuma visits the defamers, calling it a “home visit,” and uploads the correspondence to X. If the attitude is bad, he exposes the name of the company to the public. If the defamers’ attitude is not good, they threaten to expose their names and companies. In a sense, this is similar to “collection.

The above-mentioned legal expert said, “In principle, a request for disclosure is a request for a lawsuit.

In principle, a request for disclosure is made for the purpose of litigation. The purpose of the request is also written on the application form, such as ‘for the purpose of claiming damages. Is Mr. Hezuma filing a lawsuit?

If he did not file a lawsuit, but instead went to the home of the slanderer and directly collected the 500,000 yen from the slanderer’s parents, he would be deviating from the original purpose of the disclosure request,” he points out.

Hezuma also pointed out. Hezuma was once arrested and convicted as a nuisance YouTube user. Hezuma is now wielding the righteous act of “eliminating slander and libel.

Hezuma is now wielding the righteousness of “eliminating slander and libel. However, the current slander seems to be a kind of “disclosure request business,” and there has been a lot of criticism on the Internet (sports newspaper reporter).

Above all, such “collection” activities may have a negative impact on the disclosure request system in the future.

A legal expert mentioned above said

If the “sender information” continues to be used for purposes other than trials, the platform side may harden its attitude. I hope it will not be to the detriment of those who plan to request disclosure in the future. ……

Hezuma said.

Hezuma was told by a follower that the 500,000 yen settlement fee was “cheap.

There is no doubt about it. The disclosure request is 300,000 yen per person, so even 500,000 yen is only a profit of 200,000 yen. Moreover, since the change to Elon Musk, it has become more difficult to request disclosure (it takes six months to a year).

(It takes six months to a year.) Even if you request disclosure, most of them are in their 40s or 50s, unemployed. So it’s a good level if you can collect while making a story. It’s painful that they make fun of my family, but I can’t collect from something that doesn’t exist.

And I return with X.

Slander is a criminal act, and I understand the anger of having your family made fun of. However, we should not forget that there is also the “danger” of using a “disclosure request” as a story.